Hello everyone. Hope you are all doing great.
Based on our last conference, I would ask you all for updates in the procedures review work you have being done.
Bellow some notes from the meeting in Cancun and I would like to ask comments and also, if possible, information about advances in the work since then.
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Meetings Working Group (Esteban, Hervé)
5.1.1. Schedule: Suggestion: Add “the coming year.”
5.1.2. Notice Delete section (?)
5.2 Quorum
5.4. Posting of Minutes
5.5. Cancellation of regularly scheduled meeting: Suggestion: Delete “If insufficient members respond to the notice."
5.6: Types of meetings. propose some wording for this chapter
(Meeting details, including the draft agenda, will be published on the ASO AC website and will be announced prior to the meetings at the relevant RIR mailing lists too.) * I don't think that posting to the RIR lists have been a usual practice
Global Policy Working Group (Ricardo P. and Saul S.)
Considering the timing the group recommended to put this in the work plan for an full update next year. Suggestion to update the paragraph about voting and what could be missing from the MoU.
Voting (James K. and Esteban L.)
The discussion was on the different types of parameters we have in our document and also the voting mechanism. But also regarding the abstention. If it should be allowed, and if so how should it counted. General agreement was it should not be allowed except in cases of conflict of interest and even so, it should be stated clearly.
ICANN Board Selection Working Group (Gaurav S. and Ricardo P.)
Several recommendations were presented: - adjust QRC based on current requirements of having one from each region. 3 to 5 persons willing to collaborate - QRC/IC sub committee of ASO/AC - adjust IC to also not require one member from each region - a comment was made as to not require all IC members to be responsible to interview, but a sub set of it - after interviews reports should not be a ranking and expected qualities of each candidate should be agreed upon before - interview phase should continue as 60 days, but adjust timing for interviews and give candidates a reduced set of options for the interview. - questions should be worked with ASO/AC in advance. simplify wording for better understanding - candidates would receive a list of topics that could be touched in the interviews
* A draft addressing those points was sent to the mailing list on april 9th
Hello, just to send you a reminder about the last request.
it would be useful to have some update to our next teleconference
but to also remind that we agreed to have something closed to a draft text proposal by the end of this month, which is around the corner ;-)
cheers
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: reviews update Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:31:51 -0300 From: Ricardo Patara patara@registro.br Organization: https://registro.br To: procedures@aso.icann.org procedures@aso.icann.org
Hello everyone. Hope you are all doing great.
Based on our last conference, I would ask you all for updates in the procedures review work you have being done.
Bellow some notes from the meeting in Cancun and I would like to ask comments and also, if possible, information about advances in the work since then.
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Meetings Working Group (Esteban, Hervé)
5.1.1. Schedule: Suggestion: Add “the coming year.”
5.1.2. Notice Delete section (?)
5.2 Quorum
5.4. Posting of Minutes
5.5. Cancellation of regularly scheduled meeting: Suggestion: Delete “If insufficient members respond to the notice."
5.6: Types of meetings. propose some wording for this chapter
(Meeting details, including the draft agenda, will be published on the ASO AC website and will be announced prior to the meetings at the relevant RIR mailing lists too.) * I don't think that posting to the RIR lists have been a usual practice
Global Policy Working Group (Ricardo P. and Saul S.)
Considering the timing the group recommended to put this in the work plan for an full update next year. Suggestion to update the paragraph about voting and what could be missing from the MoU.
Voting (James K. and Esteban L.)
The discussion was on the different types of parameters we have in our document and also the voting mechanism. But also regarding the abstention. If it should be allowed, and if so how should it counted. General agreement was it should not be allowed except in cases of conflict of interest and even so, it should be stated clearly.
ICANN Board Selection Working Group (Gaurav S. and Ricardo P.)
Several recommendations were presented: - adjust QRC based on current requirements of having one from each region. 3 to 5 persons willing to collaborate - QRC/IC sub committee of ASO/AC - adjust IC to also not require one member from each region - a comment was made as to not require all IC members to be responsible to interview, but a sub set of it - after interviews reports should not be a ranking and expected qualities of each candidate should be agreed upon before - interview phase should continue as 60 days, but adjust timing for interviews and give candidates a reduced set of options for the interview. - questions should be worked with ASO/AC in advance. simplify wording for better understanding - candidates would receive a list of topics that could be touched in the interviews
* A draft addressing those points was sent to the mailing list on april 9th
Hi all,
Thanks Ricardo for the reminder. Please find attached the proposed changes related to the "meeting organization" paragraph.
Kind regards
Hervé
Orange Restricted
-----Message d'origine----- De : Ricardo Patara via Procedures procedures@aso.icann.org Envoyé : lundi 24 avril 2023 15:13 À : procedures@aso.icann.org Objet : [ASO-PROCEDURES] Fwd: reviews update
Hello, just to send you a reminder about the last request.
it would be useful to have some update to our next teleconference
but to also remind that we agreed to have something closed to a draft text proposal by the end of this month, which is around the corner ;-)
cheers
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: reviews update Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:31:51 -0300 From: Ricardo Patara patara@registro.br Organization: https://registro.br/ To: procedures@aso.icann.org procedures@aso.icann.org
Hello everyone. Hope you are all doing great.
Based on our last conference, I would ask you all for updates in the procedures review work you have being done.
Bellow some notes from the meeting in Cancun and I would like to ask comments and also, if possible, information about advances in the work since then.
Thanks!
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Meetings Working Group (Esteban, Hervé)
5.1.1. Schedule: Suggestion: Add "the coming year."
5.1.2. Notice Delete section (?)
5.2 Quorum
5.4. Posting of Minutes
5.5. Cancellation of regularly scheduled meeting: Suggestion: Delete "If insufficient members respond to the notice."
5.6: Types of meetings. propose some wording for this chapter
(Meeting details, including the draft agenda, will be published on the ASO AC website and will be announced prior to the meetings at the relevant RIR mailing lists too.) * I don't think that posting to the RIR lists have been a usual practice
Global Policy Working Group (Ricardo P. and Saul S.)
Considering the timing the group recommended to put this in the work plan for an full update next year. Suggestion to update the paragraph about voting and what could be missing from the MoU.
Voting (James K. and Esteban L.)
The discussion was on the different types of parameters we have in our document and also the voting mechanism. But also regarding the abstention. If it should be allowed, and if so how should it counted. General agreement was it should not be allowed except in cases of conflict of interest and even so, it should be stated clearly.
ICANN Board Selection Working Group (Gaurav S. and Ricardo P.)
Several recommendations were presented: - adjust QRC based on current requirements of having one from each region. 3 to 5 persons willing to collaborate - QRC/IC sub committee of ASO/AC - adjust IC to also not require one member from each region - a comment was made as to not require all IC members to be responsible to interview, but a sub set of it - after interviews reports should not be a ranking and expected qualities of each candidate should be agreed upon before - interview phase should continue as 60 days, but adjust timing for interviews and give candidates a reduced set of options for the interview. - questions should be worked with ASO/AC in advance. simplify wording for better understanding - candidates would receive a list of topics that could be touched in the interviews
* A draft addressing those points was sent to the mailing list on april 9th -- Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Hello,
The Election Counting section is ready for review and comment. Please find my proposed replacement for the Schulze method - Instant Run-Off Voting - and proposed text in the google docs link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17UpX3DZSgK93JXeTUjAVq15UXWEOQFk0nfOHZk58...
Let me know if you cannot access the doc or have any questions.
Regards, James
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 3:12 PM Ricardo Patara via Procedures procedures@aso.icann.org wrote:
Hello, just to send you a reminder about the last request.
it would be useful to have some update to our next teleconference
but to also remind that we agreed to have something closed to a draft text proposal by the end of this month, which is around the corner ;-)
cheers
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: reviews update Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:31:51 -0300 From: Ricardo Patara patara@registro.br Organization: https://registro.br To: procedures@aso.icann.org procedures@aso.icann.org
Hello everyone. Hope you are all doing great.
Based on our last conference, I would ask you all for updates in the procedures review work you have being done.
Bellow some notes from the meeting in Cancun and I would like to ask comments and also, if possible, information about advances in the work since then.
Thanks!
Meetings Working Group (Esteban, Hervé)
5.1.1. Schedule: Suggestion: Add “the coming year.”
5.1.2. Notice Delete section (?)
5.2 Quorum
5.4. Posting of Minutes
5.5. Cancellation of regularly scheduled meeting: Suggestion: Delete “If insufficient members respond to the notice."
5.6: Types of meetings. propose some wording for this chapter
(Meeting details, including the draft agenda, will be published on the ASO AC website and will be announced prior to the meetings at the relevant RIR mailing lists too.)
- I don't think that posting to the RIR lists have been a usual practice
Global Policy Working Group (Ricardo P. and Saul S.)
Considering the timing the group recommended to put this in the work plan for an full update next year. Suggestion to update the paragraph about voting and what could be missing from the MoU.
Voting (James K. and Esteban L.)
The discussion was on the different types of parameters we have in our document and also the voting mechanism. But also regarding the abstention. If it should be allowed, and if so how should it counted. General agreement was it should not be allowed except in cases of conflict of interest and even so, it should be stated clearly.
ICANN Board Selection Working Group (Gaurav S. and Ricardo P.)
Several recommendations were presented:
- adjust QRC based on current requirements of having one from each
region. 3 to 5 persons willing to collaborate
- QRC/IC sub committee of ASO/AC
- adjust IC to also not require one member from each region
- a comment was made as to not require all IC members to be responsible
to interview, but a sub set of it
- after interviews reports should not be a ranking and expected
qualities of each candidate should be agreed upon before
- interview phase should continue as 60 days, but adjust timing for
interviews and give candidates a reduced set of options for the interview.
- questions should be worked with ASO/AC in advance. simplify wording
for better understanding
- candidates would receive a list of topics that could be touched in the
interviews
- A draft addressing those points was sent to the mailing list on april 9th
-- Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
Hello James,
Thanks for sharing the document! If you agree, we can send this proposal and the "meeting" one to the AC-DISCUSS.
An idea could be this Wednesday for the authors to comment the change, discuss these proposals via mailing list between our May and June meeting, and have a motion in June to accept the updated texts before sharing these with the NRO EC ?
Best,
Hervé
Orange Restricted
-----Message d'origine----- De : James Kennedy jameskennedy001@gmail.com Envoyé : vendredi 28 avril 2023 11:57 À : procedures@aso.icann.org Objet : [ASO-PROCEDURES] Re: Fwd: reviews update
Hello,
The Election Counting section is ready for review and comment. Please find my proposed replacement for the Schulze method - Instant Run-Off Voting - and proposed text in the google docs link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17UpX3DZSgK93JXeTUjAVq15UXWEOQFk0nfOHZk58...
Let me know if you cannot access the doc or have any questions.
Regards, James
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 3:12 PM Ricardo Patara via Procedures procedures@aso.icann.org wrote:
Hello, just to send you a reminder about the last request.
it would be useful to have some update to our next teleconference
but to also remind that we agreed to have something closed to a draft text proposal by the end of this month, which is around the corner ;-)
cheers
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: reviews update Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:31:51 -0300 From: Ricardo Patara patara@registro.br Organization: https://regi/ stro.br%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cherve.clement%40orange.com%7C5edce1bfa351419 eec2a08db47cf0698%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6381827 26708808838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMz IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1s8RjElJXmwgVrx xXjLxawcjw0i365RZR2Eu6WfxpZg%3D&reserved=0 To: procedures@aso.icann.org procedures@aso.icann.org
Hello everyone. Hope you are all doing great.
Based on our last conference, I would ask you all for updates in the procedures review work you have being done.
Bellow some notes from the meeting in Cancun and I would like to ask comments and also, if possible, information about advances in the work since then.
Thanks!
Meetings Working Group (Esteban, Hervé)
5.1.1. Schedule: Suggestion: Add “the coming year.”
5.1.2. Notice Delete section (?)
5.2 Quorum
5.4. Posting of Minutes
5.5. Cancellation of regularly scheduled meeting: Suggestion: Delete “If insufficient members respond to the notice."
5.6: Types of meetings. propose some wording for this chapter
(Meeting details, including the draft agenda, will be published on the ASO AC website and will be announced prior to the meetings at the relevant RIR mailing lists too.)
- I don't think that posting to the RIR lists have been a usual
practice
Global Policy Working Group (Ricardo P. and Saul S.)
Considering the timing the group recommended to put this in the work plan for an full update next year. Suggestion to update the paragraph about voting and what could be missing from the MoU.
Voting (James K. and Esteban L.)
The discussion was on the different types of parameters we have in our document and also the voting mechanism. But also regarding the abstention. If it should be allowed, and if so how should it counted. General agreement was it should not be allowed except in cases of conflict of interest and even so, it should be stated clearly.
ICANN Board Selection Working Group (Gaurav S. and Ricardo P.)
Several recommendations were presented:
- adjust QRC based on current requirements of having one from each
region. 3 to 5 persons willing to collaborate
- QRC/IC sub committee of ASO/AC
- adjust IC to also not require one member from each region
- a comment was made as to not require all IC members to be
responsible to interview, but a sub set of it
- after interviews reports should not be a ranking and expected
qualities of each candidate should be agreed upon before
- interview phase should continue as 60 days, but adjust timing for
interviews and give candidates a reduced set of options for the interview.
- questions should be worked with ASO/AC in advance. simplify wording
for better understanding
- candidates would receive a list of topics that could be touched in
the interviews
- A draft addressing those points was sent to the mailing list on
april 9th
Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
-- Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Hi Hervé
I agree. I have seen some of the updates already been sent to the aso/ac mailing list but no comments. we might need to push things.
thanks
On 01/05/23 13:21, herve.clement@orange.com wrote:
Hello James,
Thanks for sharing the document! If you agree, we can send this proposal and the "meeting" one to the AC-DISCUSS.
An idea could be this Wednesday for the authors to comment the change, discuss these proposals via mailing list between our May and June meeting, and have a motion in June to accept the updated texts before sharing these with the NRO EC ?
Best,
Hervé
Orange Restricted
-----Message d'origine----- De : James Kennedy jameskennedy001@gmail.com Envoyé : vendredi 28 avril 2023 11:57 À : procedures@aso.icann.org Objet : [ASO-PROCEDURES] Re: Fwd: reviews update
Hello,
The Election Counting section is ready for review and comment. Please find my proposed replacement for the Schulze method - Instant Run-Off Voting - and proposed text in the google docs link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17UpX3DZSgK93JXeTUjAVq15UXWEOQFk0nfOHZk58...
Let me know if you cannot access the doc or have any questions.
Regards, James
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 3:12 PM Ricardo Patara via Procedures procedures@aso.icann.org wrote:
Hello, just to send you a reminder about the last request.
it would be useful to have some update to our next teleconference
but to also remind that we agreed to have something closed to a draft text proposal by the end of this month, which is around the corner ;-)
cheers
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: reviews update Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:31:51 -0300 From: Ricardo Patara patara@registro.br Organization: https://regi/ stro.br%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cherve.clement%40orange.com%7C5edce1bfa351419 eec2a08db47cf0698%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6381827 26708808838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMz IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1s8RjElJXmwgVrx xXjLxawcjw0i365RZR2Eu6WfxpZg%3D&reserved=0 To: procedures@aso.icann.org procedures@aso.icann.org
Hello everyone. Hope you are all doing great.
Based on our last conference, I would ask you all for updates in the procedures review work you have being done.
Bellow some notes from the meeting in Cancun and I would like to ask comments and also, if possible, information about advances in the work since then.
Thanks!
Meetings Working Group (Esteban, Hervé)
5.1.1. Schedule: Suggestion: Add “the coming year.”
5.1.2. Notice Delete section (?)
5.2 Quorum
5.4. Posting of Minutes
5.5. Cancellation of regularly scheduled meeting: Suggestion: Delete “If insufficient members respond to the notice."
5.6: Types of meetings. propose some wording for this chapter
(Meeting details, including the draft agenda, will be published on the ASO AC website and will be announced prior to the meetings at the relevant RIR mailing lists too.)
- I don't think that posting to the RIR lists have been a usual
practice
Global Policy Working Group (Ricardo P. and Saul S.)
Considering the timing the group recommended to put this in the work plan for an full update next year. Suggestion to update the paragraph about voting and what could be missing from the MoU.
Voting (James K. and Esteban L.)
The discussion was on the different types of parameters we have in our document and also the voting mechanism. But also regarding the abstention. If it should be allowed, and if so how should it counted. General agreement was it should not be allowed except in cases of conflict of interest and even so, it should be stated clearly.
ICANN Board Selection Working Group (Gaurav S. and Ricardo P.)
Several recommendations were presented:
- adjust QRC based on current requirements of having one from each
region. 3 to 5 persons willing to collaborate
- QRC/IC sub committee of ASO/AC
- adjust IC to also not require one member from each region
- a comment was made as to not require all IC members to be
responsible to interview, but a sub set of it
- after interviews reports should not be a ranking and expected
qualities of each candidate should be agreed upon before
- interview phase should continue as 60 days, but adjust timing for
interviews and give candidates a reduced set of options for the interview.
- questions should be worked with ASO/AC in advance. simplify wording
for better understanding
- candidates would receive a list of topics that could be touched in
the interviews
- A draft addressing those points was sent to the mailing list on
april 9th
Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
-- Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
+1, sounds like a solid plan to me. Thanks Herve.
Regards, James
On Tue, 2 May 2023 at 15:36, Ricardo Patara via Procedures < procedures@aso.icann.org> wrote:
Hi Hervé
I agree. I have seen some of the updates already been sent to the aso/ac mailing list but no comments. we might need to push things.
thanks
On 01/05/23 13:21, herve.clement@orange.com wrote:
Hello James,
Thanks for sharing the document! If you agree, we can send this proposal and the "meeting" one to the
AC-DISCUSS.
An idea could be this Wednesday for the authors to comment the change,
discuss these proposals via mailing list between our May and June meeting, and have a motion in June to accept the updated texts before sharing these with the NRO EC ?
Best,
Hervé
Orange Restricted
-----Message d'origine----- De : James Kennedy jameskennedy001@gmail.com Envoyé : vendredi 28 avril 2023 11:57 À : procedures@aso.icann.org Objet : [ASO-PROCEDURES] Re: Fwd: reviews update
Hello,
The Election Counting section is ready for review and comment. Please
find my proposed replacement for the Schulze method - Instant Run-Off Voting - and proposed text in the google docs link:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17UpX3DZSgK93JXeTUjAVq15UXWEOQFk0nfOHZk58...
Let me know if you cannot access the doc or have any questions.
Regards, James
On Mon, Apr 24, 2023 at 3:12 PM Ricardo Patara via Procedures <
procedures@aso.icann.org> wrote:
Hello, just to send you a reminder about the last request.
it would be useful to have some update to our next teleconference
but to also remind that we agreed to have something closed to a draft text proposal by the end of this month, which is around the corner ;-)
cheers
-------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: reviews update Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 17:31:51 -0300 From: Ricardo Patara patara@registro.br Organization: https://regi/ stro.br%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cherve.clement%40orange.com%7C5edce1bfa351419 eec2a08db47cf0698%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C6381827 26708808838%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMz IiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1s8RjElJXmwgVrx xXjLxawcjw0i365RZR2Eu6WfxpZg%3D&reserved=0 To: procedures@aso.icann.org procedures@aso.icann.org
Hello everyone. Hope you are all doing great.
Based on our last conference, I would ask you all for updates in the procedures review work you have being done.
Bellow some notes from the meeting in Cancun and I would like to ask comments and also, if possible, information about advances in the work since then.
Thanks!
Meetings Working Group (Esteban, Hervé)
5.1.1. Schedule: Suggestion: Add “the coming year.”
5.1.2. Notice Delete section (?)
5.2 Quorum
5.4. Posting of Minutes
5.5. Cancellation of regularly scheduled meeting: Suggestion: Delete “If insufficient members respond to the notice."
5.6: Types of meetings. propose some wording for this chapter
(Meeting details, including the draft agenda, will be published on the ASO AC website and will be announced prior to the meetings at the relevant RIR mailing lists too.)
- I don't think that posting to the RIR lists have been a usual
practice
Global Policy Working Group (Ricardo P. and Saul S.)
Considering the timing the group recommended to put this in the work plan for an full update next year. Suggestion to update the paragraph about voting and what could be missing from the MoU.
Voting (James K. and Esteban L.)
The discussion was on the different types of parameters we have in our document and also the voting mechanism. But also regarding the abstention. If it should be allowed, and if so how should it counted. General agreement was it should not be allowed except in cases of conflict of interest and even so, it should be stated clearly.
ICANN Board Selection Working Group (Gaurav S. and Ricardo P.)
Several recommendations were presented:
- adjust QRC based on current requirements of having one from each
region. 3 to 5 persons willing to collaborate
- QRC/IC sub committee of ASO/AC
- adjust IC to also not require one member from each region
- a comment was made as to not require all IC members to be
responsible to interview, but a sub set of it
- after interviews reports should not be a ranking and expected
qualities of each candidate should be agreed upon before
- interview phase should continue as 60 days, but adjust timing for
interviews and give candidates a reduced set of options for the
interview.
- questions should be worked with ASO/AC in advance. simplify wording
for better understanding
- candidates would receive a list of topics that could be touched in
the interviews
- A draft addressing those points was sent to the mailing list on
april 9th
Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
-- Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send
an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
-- Procedures mailing list -- procedures@aso.icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to procedures-leave@aso.icann.org
participants (3)
-
herve.clement＠orange.com -
James Kennedy -
Ricardo Patara